Campus AI Framework / Pillar 4 — Risk
Download framework
Proportionality · risk tiering applied through the NIST RMF

Govern each system in proportion to its stakes

These three tiers are this framework's own, applied through the NIST AI RMF: Map categorizes each system, Measure assesses its risk, and Manage treats it. Domain 9 owns the standard; every domain applies it. The tier rates how much a system decides, not how much an office matters — a critical department can run entirely on Assistive tools, and that's the goal.

Why this matters Not every AI use needs the same scrutiny. Tiering lets low-stakes tools move fast while high-stakes ones get real review — oversight that's proportionate, not bureaucratic.
Oversight scales with stakes more at stake → more scrutiny
1 RMF function
Assistive
Tier 1 · Low
3 functions
Operational
Tier 2 · Moderate
4 functions
+ impact assessment
Consequential
Tier 3 · High
Tier 1 · Low
Assistive

Tools that support a person who stays fully in control, with no decision authority. Where most systems should stay — keeping a human in charge is the win, not a limitation.

RMF Govern
Acceptable-use compliance + approved tool list
Tier 2 · Moderate
Operational

Systems that inform work or decisions with meaningful human review in the loop.

RMF Govern Map Measure
Data-governance review + departmental approval
Tier 3 · High
Consequential

Systems that make or inform decisions materially affecting people's lives and rights.

RMF Map Measure Manage
Impact assessment · bias audit · human oversight · notification & appeals · evidence package · inventory
Map + Measure
The assessment behind the tier: a NIST-aligned algorithmic impact assessment

Before any consequential system deploys, Domain 6 requires an algorithmic impact assessment aligned to the RMF's Map and Measure functions — drawing on the Playbook's suggested actions and transparency & documentation questions to establish context, test for bias, and record the evidence that sets the system's tier.

← Five risk categories
Cross-domain risk →